Fired for a Questionable Reason? Put More Than 30 Years of Experience to Work
We evaluate firings, forced resignations, and suspicious performance explanations by examining what happened before and after employment ended. Complaints, leave requests, changing reviews, disciplinary actions, and inconsistent explanations may reveal whether an employer’s stated reason conceals discrimination, retaliation, or another unlawful motive.
We serve Scottsdale employees from our Phoenix practice, providing direct attorney guidance when a job loss threatens income, benefits, professional reputation, and future employment.
Call (602) 833-0220 to speak with our wrongful termination attorneys about your timeline, records, and legal options during a confidential consultation.
Wrongful & Unlawful Termination Matters We Handle
Arizona employers generally have broad authority to end at-will employment, but they can’t fire someone for a reason prohibited by law, a qualifying employment contract, or protected public policy. We assess whether the facts support an unlawful termination claim, not simply whether the employer’s decision seemed unfair.
Our employment practice addresses terminations involving:
Employment discrimination: Firing based on race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, pregnancy, or another characteristic protected by applicable law.
Retaliation: Adverse action following a discrimination complaint, wage concern, protected leave request, or another legally protected activity.
Whistleblowing: Termination connected to reporting suspected misconduct or refusing to participate in unlawful conduct.
Employment contracts: Disputes involving written agreements, compensation terms, executive arrangements, or required termination procedures.
Constructive discharge: A forced resignation caused by working conditions so intolerable that a reasonable employee would feel compelled to leave.
Government employment: Cases involving public and federal employees who may have distinct rights, procedures, and appeal options.
Depending on the claim, we represent clients in administrative proceedings, negotiations, mediation, arbitration, and state or federal court.
An Early Evaluation Can Preserve Important Options
We begin by examining the reason the employer gave, who made the decision, whether the explanation changed, and what protected activity occurred beforehand. We then compare that timeline with performance records, workplace policies, employment contracts, and the treatment of other workers where relevant.
Relevant records may include:
Termination notices, offer letters, employment agreements, and handbooks
Performance reviews and disciplinary notices
Emails, text messages, complaints, and leave or pay records
Names and contact information for potential witnesses
Preserve these materials without deleting, editing, or altering communications. Don’t access records you aren’t legally authorized to obtain.
You’ll work directly with the attorney handling your case. We review the documents, timeline, possible forums, risks, and practical effects before discussing whether an agency filing, negotiation, mediation, arbitration, or litigation fits your circumstances.
AV Preeminent Rated Employment Counsel for Scottsdale Workers
Our firm, Yen Pilch Robaina & Kresin, holds an AV Preeminent rating from Martindale-Hubbell, a peer-review rating for legal ability and professional ethics. Our attorneys have appeared before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the Arizona Supreme Court, and Arizona appellate and trial courts.
For more than three decades, we’ve represented employees, executives, government workers, and federal employees in workplace disputes. That experience informs how we assess procedural requirements, conflicting evidence, litigation risks, and realistic paths forward without forcing every case into the same process.
When Arizona At-Will Employment Can Cross a Legal Line
At-will employment generally allows an employer or employee to end the working relationship without advance notice or a stated reason. It doesn’t permit a firing that violates employment discrimination laws, retaliation protections, a qualifying contract, or recognized public policy.
A discharge may warrant legal review when it follows protected leave, a discrimination complaint, a workers’ compensation claim, whistleblowing, or refusal to participate in unlawful conduct. Government workers and employees with contracts may also have procedures or protections that don’t apply to an ordinary private-sector position.
Filing Deadlines Depend on the Claim & Forum
Deadlines vary based on the legal claim, employer size, agency, and underlying facts. Employment charges submitted to the Arizona Civil Rights Division generally must be filed within 180 days of the alleged unlawful practice. For many covered discrimination claims in Arizona, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission generally applies a 300-day filing period.
Those periods don’t govern every claim, and other notice requirements or lawsuit deadlines may be shorter. When Arizona and federal discrimination laws overlap, a charge filed with one agency may be dual-filed with the other. A prompt review can help identify the correct forum and applicable deadline before an option expires.
Evidence That May Reveal an Unlawful Firing
The termination meeting is only one part of the timeline. We look for connections between the firing and earlier complaints, accommodation requests, protected leave, wage concerns, performance reviews, disciplinary notices, or changes in job duties.
Important evaluation questions include:
What reason did the employer provide, and did that explanation change?
Who participated in the decision, and what did each person know?
Did protected activity occur shortly before the firing?
Were similarly situated employees treated differently?
What documents, messages, policies, or witnesses support the timeline?
An unfair or poorly handled firing isn’t automatically unlawful. Available claims and remedies depend on the governing law, evidence, timing, employer, and consequences of the job loss.
We care about our clients as if they were our family, showing them care and compassion throughout the entire process.
We Work Hand in Hand with Our Clients
We work closely with our clients to address their needs and find favorable solutions to their employment-related, personal injury and estate planning issues.
Experienced Attorneys Ready to Fight for You
The experienced Phoenix employment lawyers of Yen Pilch Robaina & Kresin PLC understand what it takes to achieve results for our clients.
Trusted for Over 30 Years
Our firm brings a high level of experience to each and every matter, and we have helped clients secure millions of dollars in total settlements and verdicts.
Client Testimonials
“This office is a great resource”
“As an educator working for a non-union Charter School, I did not not who to turn to when my principal started improper practices with teachers during COVID19. We were shocked he would treated us so poorly during a pandemic.”
B. Burton
“He is extremely intelligent”
“Mr Robaina was a God sent.”
Anthony H.
“I would recommend this firm for any employment cases.”
“Very friendly and welcoming folks there. The attorney listened to my situation with great interest, and offered excellent legal advice.”
Preston J.
“Our case was resolved in a manner favorable”
“Ed Robaina and his team represented my company during a very difficult lawsuit against a deep-pocket company represented by one of the largest law firms in the southwest. Robaina's team was very professional, always prepared, and very patient with us.”
Tod W.
“They are honest and trustworthy”
“I have hired Robaina and Kresin on several occasions over the last ten years. Their service has been professional and complete with attention to detail.”
Brent W.
“We need more lawyers like you.”
“I am a doctor at a federal agency who was discriminated against. Edmundo Robaina took my case at short notice, just a few weeks before the hearing, reviewed thousands of pages, conducted interviews efficiently, and led the case effectively to a very suc”
Medical Doctor
“I requested and received a top notch legal defense”
“Robaina and Kresin represented me as a defendant in an employment discrimination case. Because the allegations were extremely harmful to my reputation and not true, it was not a case that could be settled. I requested and received a top notch legal defe”
Bruce H.
“I would highly recommend Mr. Kresin to others.”
“David Kresin is intelligent, intuitive, quick to assimilate information and strategic in his thinking.”